PBWT

SEPTEMBER 30, 2022

” 11 U.S.C. § ” 11 U.S.C. § ” 11 U.S.C. § The first agreement was entered in March 2011, and expired on March 19, 2018, but the parties executed a series of successive extension agreements, extending it through March 31, 2019. RMS filed a chapter 11 petition on February 11, 2019.

Bankruptcy 112

Bankruptcy Debtor Lender Government 112

Troutman Sanders

AUGUST 16, 2021

The FFIEC noted two changes over the last decade that prompted this analysis: (1) the current cybersecurity threat landscape, which has necessitated an increased need for effective customer authentication, and (2) the expansion of authentication considerations beyond customers to employees, third parties, and system-to-system communications.

Financial Institution 52

Financial Institution Banks Education Government 52

Jimerson Firm

JANUARY 17, 2023

It happens more than you would think—to both small, family-owned businesses, and even national corporations—when people come to an agreement regarding a business transaction, only to later find that one or both of the parties failed to sign the contract governing the relationship. 5th DCA 2011). Is the contract still enforceable?

Construction 52

Construction Creditor's Rights Government Commercial Collection 52

ABI

MARCH 9, 2020

5] Acis was named as an alleged debtor in an involuntary petition for relief under chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code. [6] 11]. (“Highland”) was an insider of Acis and provided management to services to Acis pursuant to a Shared Services Agreement. [5] 11] See id. 1] In In re Acis Capital Mgmt., 9] See id.

Bankruptcy 40

Bankruptcy Debtor Collateral Construction 40

FDCPA Defense

APRIL 17, 2019

2011) (letter from law firm violated section 1692e where it “falsely impl[ied] that an attorney, acting as an attorney, is involved in collecting Lesher's debt.”). Can The Federal Government Target Me And My Clients Using The “Meaningful Attorney Involvement” Doctrine? Dickerson , 307 F.3d 3d 623, 635 (7th Cir. Kay , 650 F.3d

Lawyers 40

Lawyers Creditor's Rights Law Firms Creditors 40

FDCPA Defense

JANUARY 22, 2017

In some jurisdictions, even statements that you make to a court, or to your opposing counsel, may be governed by the FDCPA, so these practices should also be evaluated for compliance with the Act. 2541, 2551 (2011); Powers v. If your firm is served with a class action complaint, you certainly must turn your attention to it immediately.

Collections 40

Collections Judgment Creditors Law Firms 40

FDCPA Defense

FEBRUARY 1, 2018

as well as analogous state laws governing the consumer collection process. Litton Loan Servicing, LP , 2011 WL 635258, at *4 (N.D. 11, 2011) (“Since the debt at issue was incurred in connection with a rental property, as opposed to a personal, family or household purpose, the FDCPA has no application here.”); Sparlin v.

Accrued Interest 40

Accrued Interest Foreclosure Debt collector Debtor 40