This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
District Court for the District of New Hampshire granted the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) motion for summary judgment against blockchain-based, file-sharing platform LBRY. In its summary judgment motion, the SEC argued that LBRY’s public offering of its native token LBC constituted an unregistered sale of securities.
LTD FinancialServices, L.P. , LTD FinancialServices, L.P. , The plaintiff owed a debt of $4,528.59 Further because the plaintiff premised her claim for Section 1692f violation on the same conduct, the court held that this claim also could not survive summary judgment. In Bordeaux v.
A New York District Court recently addressed the issue of whether the FDCPA requires passive debt buyers to personally register disputes or whether they can delegate that obligation to their third party debt collector/servicer. Passive debt buyers purchase debt but retain third parties to service and collect the debt.
Beyond the student loan and mortgage context, state attorney generals have advanced this theory in their investigations of auto lenders [4] and debtsettlement companies. [5]. 1, 2021), [link] ; See e.g., Final Judgment, Commonwealth v. 1, 2021), [link] ; See e.g., Final Judgment, Commonwealth v. DMB Financial, LLC. ,
Pritzker issued an executive order extending the suspension of garnishment, deduction of wages, and post-judgment citations to discover assets through April 30. The company was operating without registering as a debtsettlementservice provider as required by Minnesota law. For more information, click here.
On July 18, Indiana University’s COVID-19 vaccine mandate and related face-masking and testing requirements survived challenging students’ motion for a preliminary judgment. To attend the meeting, click here. The students argued the vaccine requirement was a due process violation under the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 19,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content