article thumbnail

Ambiguous Language in Validation Notice Creates Disputed Issue of Material Fact on Meaningful Attorney Involvement Claim

Consumer Financial Services Law

District Court for the Eastern District of New York recently denied cross-motions for summary judgment on a debtor’s claim that a law firm’s validation notice constituted a meaningful attorney involvement violation of the FDCPA. By: Landon G. Van Winkle The U.S. Solovyova v. Grossman & Karaszewski PLLC , No. 19-CV-2996, 2021 U.S.

article thumbnail

What Are “Statutory Damages” Under the FCCPA and the FDCPA?

Jimerson Firm

Oftentimes, consumer lawyers bring claims for technical violations of the statutes, even when there are not any actual damages suffered by a consumer. is board certified in business litigation by the Florida Bar and practices in the firm’s banking and financial services industry team. Businesses should be aware of each statute.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Sixth Circuit Side Steps the Bona Fide Error Defense

Consumer Financial Services Law

As drolly described by the Court, “[a] lawyer sued two lawyers, and each side hired more lawyers. A series of post judgment garnishments. In Van Hoven , a law firm enforced a judgment by filing a series of garnishments. LEXIS 1483, *2 (6 th Cir. So what caused this apocalyptic litigation war?

article thumbnail

Serving a Defendant in a Residential Foreclosure Action by Publication

Jimerson Firm

The defendant is required to file written defenses with the clerk of the court and serve a copy on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s lawyer within thirty (30) days after the first publication of the Notice of Action. 49.09, Fla. Failure to Comply With Requirements. See Shepheard v. See Shepheard v. Deutsche Bank Tr. Americas , 922 So. 2d 340 (Fla.

article thumbnail

Data Breach Class Actions: Analyzing Standing for Future Injuries-in-Fact (Part 2)

Jimerson Firm

However, within one year, the Eleventh Circuit granted hearing en banc and vacated the judgment. The court rejected the proposition that plaintiffs with no standing in the Eleventh Circuit could be part of a nationwide class, even if they may have standing in accordance with the precedential holdings of other circuits. at 1358–59.

Lawyers 59
article thumbnail

Sixth Circuit Decision Highlights the Risk of Initiating Collection Remedies During the FDCPA’s Validation Period

BN Lawyers

The district court granted summary judgment, holding that Trott had ceased collection of the debt because Trott itself performed no more activity. Both the text of the FDCPA and the applicable case law make it clear that Section 1692g does not provide a grace period.

article thumbnail

Supreme Court Excludes Non-Judicial Foreclosure From FDCPA

BN Lawyers

If a deficiency judgment is sought (or possible with contractual fees and costs) such a request for relief might be sufficient to trigger the FDCPA’s “debt collector” definition. Similar risks may lie in wait for attorneys who pursue replevin actions.