This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
By: Mark J. Dobosz January 24, 2017 “He will win who knows when to fight and when not to fight.” Sun Tzu The art of fighting a battle means that you must learn all there is to know about your enemy. This knowledge can only come about through careful observation, research and even when possible, conversations with factions of your foes. While the work of understanding and gathering information on how a federal government agency (i.e. the CFPB) acts, responds and strategizes can be laborious, the
PRESS RELEASE. Indiana Consumer Law Group/The Law Office of Robert E. Duff announces the recent filing of a class action lawsuit against Condor Securitization Trust, Condor Holdco Securitization Trust, Condor Assetco Securitization Trust and Condor Recovery Securitization Trust arising out of the repossession of an Indiana couple’s vehicle. The complaint alleges that the Notice of Sale sent to the plaintiffs did not comply with the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) in a number of respects.
(This post is adopted from the materials presented at the CAI Law Seminar in Las Vegas, Nevada on January 20, 2017) Demystifying the FDCPA Class Action For HOA Attorneys Consumer attorneys have been filing FDCPA class actions against collection attorneys for decades, and the pace of those filings has increased sharply in the past ten years. Attorneys who collect for national banks, debt buyers or other financial institutions have been regular targets in FDCPA class actions.
The CFPB recently released its findings from its Survey of Consumer Views on Debt. The report is of limited value as it contains a relatively small sampling of consumers. 10,876 consumers were selected based upon de-identified consumer records provided by one of the three major consumer reporting agencies. Of those, only 20% participated, yielding a sampling of 2,132 consumers.
In the climb from contributor to leader, the rules quietly change. But if you’re aiming for the summit, the air gets thinner, and what got you here won’t be enough to get you to the top. 🗻 What made you successful early in your finance career—technical accuracy, sharp analysis, flawless execution—won’t be what carries you to the next level. The higher you go, the more your effectiveness depends on how you connect, adapt, and communicate.
The CFPB’s concern with incentives and overdrafts continues and has resulted in a lawsuit filed against a Minnesota based TCF National Bank. In the lawsuit, the CFPB alleges that TCF National Bank violated the UDAAP provisions of the Consumer Financial Protection Act and the Electronic Funds Transfers Act (“EFTA”). In 2010, EFTA was amended to require consumers “opt in” to overdraft coverage for ATM and one-time debit card transactions.
The CFPB recently issued its third consent order involving a debt collection law firm and appears to be expanding its interpretation of “meaningful involvement”. The order, which was entered against two related debt collection firms and their principal, calls into question how debt collection firms fundamentally conduct business. See In the Matter of Works & Lentz, Inc., et al, File No. 2017-CFPB-0003.
The CFPB recently issued its third consent order involving a debt collection law firm and appears to be expanding its interpretation of “meaningful involvement”. The order, which was entered against two related debt collection firms and their principal, calls into question how debt collection firms fundamentally conduct business. See In the Matter of Works & Lentz, Inc., et al, File No. 2017-CFPB-0003.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 19,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content