article thumbnail

The “Least Sophisticated Debtor” Is Getting More Sophisticated, And Has An Improved Memory Too

FDCPA Defense

Courts apply the very pro-consumer “least sophisticated debtor” standard when evaluating a collector’s communications, and most violations of the Act are “strict liability” – meaning the debtor can win the case without proving the collector intended to violate the statute. Hollins Law Firm , _F.3d Hollins Law Firm , _F.3d

Debtor 40
article thumbnail

Searching For The Meaning Of “Meaningful Involvement”

FDCPA Defense

When, if ever, should collection law firms include disclaimers on their collection letters, indicating that no attorney of the firm has reviewed the particular circumstances of the debtor’s file? The defendant attorney “did not make the decision to send a letter to a debtor; Household did.” The answer is unclear.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Trends In FDCPA Litigation Filed Against HOA Attorneys

FDCPA Defense

2012) (intent of debtor at time of purchase controls). Most courts have held that fines imposed by HOAs are not “debts” covered by the FDCPA. Kansas 2014) (HOA fines not debts under FDCPA); Mlnarik v. Are You Engaged In “Debt Collection” Under The FDCPA? Cheatham Farms Master HOA , 2018 WL 4297480 (C.D. 3d 290 (6th Cir.

article thumbnail

Why Every Lawyer And Client Should Be Fighting To Stop The "Meaningful Attorney Involvement" Doctrine From Spreading

FDCPA Defense

Indeed, the “meaningful attorney involvement” theory has been embraced by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (“CFPB”) in its enforcement actions against large creditors’ rights law firms. Your law firm is also named a defendant. Law Offices Of Mitchell N. At the end of that week, however, things go sour.

Lawyers 40
article thumbnail

Is Your Envelope “Benign” Under The FDCPA?

FDCPA Defense

Judgment Enforcement Law Firm, PLLC , 2014 WL 1744268, **3-4 (W.D. 30, 2014) (section 1692f(8) violated by use of name “Judgment Enforcement Law Firm” on envelope); Rutyna v. Courts have held that collectors may violate section 1692f(8) simply by placing their own name on the envelope. See, e.g., Keasey v. 980, 982 (N.D.

article thumbnail

Emerging Trends In FDCPA Litigation Against Community Association Attorneys

FDCPA Defense

One line of cases creates a duty to disclose to the debtor that the amount of the debt may be increasing due to accruing interest, fees or other charges. To avoid confusion to the debtor, the Avila Court held that use of the “safe harbor” language from the Miller case would be sufficient. Riexinger & Associates, LLC , 817 F.3d

article thumbnail

Can Recent Enforcement Actions Provide Guidance On The CFPB’s Position On UDAAPs?

FDCPA Defense

NCO also agreed not place calls to any telephone number about a particular account if NCO had already been informed by anyone at that number that the debtor cannot be reached at that number or the person does not have location information about the debtor.

Debtor 40