article thumbnail

The “Least Sophisticated Debtor” Is Getting More Sophisticated, And Has An Improved Memory Too

FDCPA Defense

Courts apply the very pro-consumer “least sophisticated debtor” standard when evaluating a collector’s communications, and most violations of the Act are “strict liability” – meaning the debtor can win the case without proving the collector intended to violate the statute.

Debtor 40
article thumbnail

Is It “Debt Collection” If You Never Asked For Money?

FDCPA Defense

the “FDCPA”) if it never asks the debtor to pay any money? What exactly does the term “debt collection” mean in the context of the FDCPA? The circuit courts have reached different conclusions on whether a “debt collection” communication must make a demand on the debtor for payment of money in order to be subject to the FDCPA.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Trends In FDCPA Litigation Filed Against HOA Attorneys

FDCPA Defense

2012) (intent of debtor at time of purchase controls). Most courts have held that fines imposed by HOAs are not “debts” covered by the FDCPA. Kansas 2014) (HOA fines not debts under FDCPA); Mlnarik v. to pay money,” non-judicial foreclosure is not covered under FDCPA) (citations omitted), pet. Alexander, et al 698 F.3d

article thumbnail

Searching For The Meaning Of “Meaningful Involvement”

FDCPA Defense

The agency ( not the attorney) mailed letters to “approximately one million debtors each year” using a computerized mass-mailing system, with a letterhead referencing the defendant – “P.D. The defendant attorney “did not make the decision to send a letter to a debtor; Household did.” Kay , 650 F.3d 3d 993 (3d Cir.

article thumbnail

Emerging Trends In FDCPA Litigation Against Community Association Attorneys

FDCPA Defense

One line of cases creates a duty to disclose to the debtor that the amount of the debt may be increasing due to accruing interest, fees or other charges. To avoid confusion to the debtor, the Avila Court held that use of the “safe harbor” language from the Miller case would be sufficient. Riexinger & Associates, LLC , 817 F.3d

article thumbnail

Is The CFBP's Position On Credit Reporting Statements Consistent With The Case Law?

FDCPA Defense

The Ninth Circuit rejected the consumer’s claim that the letter violated sections 1692e, 1692e(5) and 1692e(10) of the FDCPA, noting that: “The body of the notice was informational, notifying Wade that failure to pay could adversely affect her credit reputation….The Equifax Check Services, Inc., 3d 410, 418 (7th Cir. 2d 896 (N.D. 558, 566 (D.

article thumbnail

Why California Fair Debt Buyer’s Act May Decrease Communication And Increase Litigation Between Debt Buyers And Consumers

FDCPA Defense

Information Required Before Writing To Consumers The Act regulates information that a debt buyer must possess, and documentation that the debt buyer must have access to, before the debt buyer makes “any written statement to the debtor in an attempt to collect a consumer debt.” Code § 1788.52. at § 1788.52(b). a) and (b) of the Act.

Debtor 40