FDCPA Defense

AUGUST 22, 2016

Hollins Law Firm , _F.3d There, the collection law firm defendant communicated with plaintiff on a number of occasions, and each time the firm identified itself as a “debt collector,” as required by section 1692e(11) of the FDCPA. 3d _, 2016 WL 4174747 (9th Cir. On appeal, the Ninth Circuit reversed.

Debtor 40

Debtor Debt collector Law Firms Accrued Interest 40

FDCPA Defense

MARCH 2, 2014

One method for identifying areas of potential concern, however, is to analyze the recent enforcement actions by the CFPB and other regulators filed against debt buyers and original creditors. Enforcement actions filed against original creditors can also provide guidance to debt buyers and other collectors about areas of CFPB concern.

Debtor 40

Debtor Banks Original Creditor Collections 40

FDCPA Defense

JANUARY 28, 2012

Consumers and their attorneys are constantly seeking to expand the pool of potential FDCPA defendants using principles of vicarious liability. Debt buyers are being sued based on the conduct of their agencies and law firms. For this reason, original creditors are not subject to the FDCPA (except in very limited circumstances).

Debt collector 40

Debt collector Retrieval Creditors Original Creditor 40

FDCPA Defense

JANUARY 22, 2017

As you evaluate your firm’s risk to these cases, you will want to review every consumer-facing interaction of the firm top to bottom, including any letter forms utilized, your standard telephone practices and voicemail messages, the complaints, pleadings, discovery requests, and the post-judgment collection practices you employ.

Collections 40

Collections Judgment Creditors Law Firms 40