This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
The CFPB issued its Monthly Report this week. The report is a high level snapshot of trends in consumer complaints and provides a summary of the volume of complaints by product category, by company and by state. Additionally, each month it highlights a product type and a geographic area. This month’s report highlights prepaid card products and emphasizes the CFPB’s concern for the unbanked and underbanked population.
In his prepared remarks to the Mortgage Bankers Association, CFPB Director Richard Cordray offered some insight into his office’s examination priorities with respect to the mortgage industry. Here are the key takeaways: TRID: In his remarks, Cordray characterized the CFPB’s early examinations of TRID compliance to be “diagnostic and corrective, not punitive.
The Eleventh Circuit recently issued an opinion emphasizing the importance of timing under the Mortgage Servicing Rules. In Lage v. Ocwen Loan Servicing, the court considered whether the mortgage servicer had an obligation to evaluate a loss mitigation application when, at the time the completed application was submitted, a foreclosure sale was scheduled to occur in two days.
For purposes of RESPA, is there a difference to be had between “servicing” a loan and being a “servicer”? The question was recently addressed by a district court from Florida. Buyea v. Select Portfolio Servicing, No. 9:16-cv-80347, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 140571 (S.D. Fla. Oct. 11, 2016). In Buyea, the consumer submitted a request for information (“RFI”) requesting the identity, address and telephone number of the current owner or assignee of the mortgage.
In the climb from contributor to leader, the rules quietly change. But if you’re aiming for the summit, the air gets thinner, and what got you here won’t be enough to get you to the top. 🗻 What made you successful early in your finance career—technical accuracy, sharp analysis, flawless execution—won’t be what carries you to the next level. The higher you go, the more your effectiveness depends on how you connect, adapt, and communicate.
Input your email to sign up, or if you already have an account, log in here!
Enter your email address to reset your password. A temporary password will be e‑mailed to you.
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 19,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
Let's personalize your content