This site uses cookies to improve your experience. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country, we will assume you are from the United States. Select your Cookie Settings or view our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use.
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Used for the proper function of the website
Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
Cookie Settings
Cookies and similar technologies are used on this website for proper function of the website, for tracking performance analytics and for marketing purposes. We and some of our third-party providers may use cookie data for various purposes. Please review the cookie settings below and choose your preference.
Strictly Necessary: Used for the proper function of the website
Performance/Analytics: Used for monitoring website traffic and interactions
A number of trade groups from across the financial services industry, including ACA International, have petitioned the Federal Communications Commission to delay the enactment of a rule related to the Telephone Consumer Protection Act that is scheduled to go into effect next month. Meanwhile, the FCC has launched a deregulation initiative and is seeking comment on all existing FCC rules that may create unnecessary regulatory burdens.
Looking to execute on a judgment but need more information about the judgment debtors assets to collect? If so, you might consider a debtors exam. A debtors exam provides an opportunity for the creditor to question the judgment debtor and discover information related to the defendants assets. The information sought is meant to identify assets that can be used to satisfy the plaintiff’s judgment.
A bill is under consideration in the Oklahoma legislature that would prohibit certain medical debts from being reported to credit bureaus, preventing them from impacting consumers credit scores. Driving the news: House Bill 1709, introduced by Rep. Forrest Bennett, a Democrat from Oklahoma City, aims to prevent creditors and debt collectors from reporting medical debt incurred for lifesaving and emergency care services to consumer reporting agencies.
A new study, based on an exclusive survey by The Kaplan Group , provides a comprehensive analysis of payment collection challenges, focusing on companies affected by high and very high Days Sales Outstanding (DSO). The research spans various industries and company sizes, offering insights into revenue distributions, industry-specific trends, and the impact of delayed payments on cash flow management.
In the climb from contributor to leader, the rules quietly change. But if you’re aiming for the summit, the air gets thinner, and what got you here won’t be enough to get you to the top. 🗻 What made you successful early in your finance career—technical accuracy, sharp analysis, flawless execution—won’t be what carries you to the next level. The higher you go, the more your effectiveness depends on how you connect, adapt, and communicate.
Plaintiff Sues for Not Being Able to Arbitrate Judge Denies Motion from Plaintiff to Reconsider Standing in FDCPA Case Trade Groups Petition FCC to Delay TCPA Rule Amid Deregulation Push Oklahoma Bill Would Shield Some Medical Debt from Credit Reports WORTH NOTING: Exposure to heat is as dangerous as smoking, according to new research … Is anyone surprised that most people lie to their dentists about their dental hygiene habits?
A Magistrate Court judge in Wisconsin has denied a plaintiff’s motion to alter a judgment which ruled he did not have standing to pursue claims the defendant violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, finding that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a concrete injury that could be linked to the defendant’s alleged misconduct. The background: The plaintiff filed the suit, accusing the defendant of engaging in illegal debt collection practices, including attempting to collect a n
A Magistrate Court judge in Wisconsin has denied a plaintiff’s motion to alter a judgment which ruled he did not have standing to pursue claims the defendant violated the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, finding that the plaintiff failed to demonstrate a concrete injury that could be linked to the defendant’s alleged misconduct. The background: The plaintiff filed the suit, accusing the defendant of engaging in illegal debt collection practices, including attempting to collect a n
EDITORS NOTE: This article is part of a series that is sponsored by WebRecon. WebRecon identifies serial plaintiffs lurking in your database BEFORE you contact them and expose yourself to a likely lawsuit. Protect your company from as many as one in three new consumer lawsuits by scrubbing your consumers through WebRecon first. Want to learn more? Call (855) WEB-RECON or email admin@webrecon.net today!
We organize all of the trending information in your field so you don't have to. Join 19,000+ users and stay up to date on the latest articles your peers are reading.
You know about us, now we want to get to know you!
Let's personalize your content
Let's get even more personalized
We recognize your account from another site in our network, please click 'Send Email' below to continue with verifying your account and setting a password.
130 
Let's personalize your content