Remove Creditors Remove Debtor Remove FDCPA Defense Remove Judgment
article thumbnail

The “Least Sophisticated Debtor” Is Getting More Sophisticated, And Has An Improved Memory Too

FDCPA Defense

Courts apply the very pro-consumer “least sophisticated debtor” standard when evaluating a collector’s communications, and most violations of the Act are “strict liability” – meaning the debtor can win the case without proving the collector intended to violate the statute. On appeal, the Ninth Circuit reversed.

Debtor 40
article thumbnail

Why Every Lawyer And Client Should Be Fighting To Stop The "Meaningful Attorney Involvement" Doctrine From Spreading

FDCPA Defense

Although this scenario may sound far-fetched, it is an everyday occurrence for creditors’ rights attorneys, who have been targeted by “meaningful attorney involvement” lawsuits for years. If this can happen to creditors’ rights attorneys and their clients, might you and your clients be next? the “FDCPA”). 1692, et seq.

Lawyers 40
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Why California Fair Debt Buyer’s Act May Decrease Communication And Increase Litigation Between Debt Buyers And Consumers

FDCPA Defense

Under the new Act, however, if a debt buyer wants to send a letter to a consumer, it must already have possession of, or access to, all the documents and information it will need to obtain a default judgment against the consumer. Code § 1788.52. 3) The date of default or the date of the last payment. (4)

Debtor 40
article thumbnail

Avoiding Overshadowing Claims

FDCPA Defense

Section 1692g of the FDCPA says collectors must provide notice to consumers within five days of the initial communication regarding the debt, stating the amount of the debt, the name of the current creditor, and explaining the consumer’s right to dispute the debt and to obtain verification. See 15 U.S.C. 1692g(a)(1), (2). 1692g(a)(4).

article thumbnail

Is Your Envelope “Benign” Under The FDCPA?

FDCPA Defense

Judgment Enforcement Law Firm, PLLC , 2014 WL 1744268, **3-4 (W.D. 30, 2014) (section 1692f(8) violated by use of name “Judgment Enforcement Law Firm” on envelope); Rutyna v. Courts have held that collectors may violate section 1692f(8) simply by placing their own name on the envelope. See, e.g., Keasey v. 980, 982 (N.D. 1298, 1305 (D.

article thumbnail

Can Recent Enforcement Actions Provide Guidance On The CFPB’s Position On UDAAPs?

FDCPA Defense

One method for identifying areas of potential concern, however, is to analyze the recent enforcement actions by the CFPB and other regulators filed against debt buyers and original creditors. Enforcement actions filed against original creditors can also provide guidance to debt buyers and other collectors about areas of CFPB concern.

Debtor 40
article thumbnail

The Limits On Direct And Vicarious Liability Under The FDCPA

FDCPA Defense

Even original creditors, who are not subject to the FDCPA, are being drawn into FDCPA litigation under various theories of recovery. What are the limits of vicarious liability under the FDCPA? For this reason, original creditors are not subject to the FDCPA (except in very limited circumstances).