7th Circuit Challenges Whether Plaintiffs Had Standing in Recent District Court Cases
Troutman Sanders
JANUARY 11, 2021
With these holdings, the Seventh Circuit stated that simply alleging a procedural violation, confusion, or annoyance under the FDCPA does not constitute an injury-in-fact and that plaintiffs need to show real harm resulting from their responses to debt collectors’ actions to have Article III standing in federal court. In Bazile v.
52 
Let's personalize your content