2017 11 Fair Debt Collection Related Topics 
Roths Child Law
NOVEMBER 7, 2020
Congress needs to enact laws expanding consumer protections against abusive debt collection, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled in 2017. Defendant debt collector Santander Consumer USA Holdings ultimately prevailed because it was not collecting money on behalf of a third party. As written, the U.S.
Troutman Sanders
DECEMBER 8, 2020
in attorneys’ fees after accepting an offer of judgment as to claims under the Fair Debt Collections Practices Act (“FDCPA”). The claim at issue concerned a September 11, 2017 collection letter sent by Monarch Recovery Management (“Monarch”) indicating that Gould owed a debt that totaled $932.30
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Collection Industry News
DECEMBER 21, 2020
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently reversed an award of summary judgment in favor of a defendant debt collector against claims that it violated the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) by attempting to collect a debt that was discharged in bankruptcy and no longer owed.
FDCPA Defense
FEBRUARY 1, 2018
Attorneys and other entities that regularly engage in collection work for community associations may be subject to the requirements of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. as well as analogous state laws governing the consumer collection process. 2017), petition for cert. 21, 2017) (No.
FDCPA Defense
APRIL 17, 2019
The “meaningful attorney involvement” doctrine evolved out of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. 2017-CFPB-0003. How did everything go wrong for creditors’ rights attorneys? 1692, et seq. the “FDCPA”). Hanna & Assocs, et al., United States District Court, Northern District Of Georgia, Case No.,
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
98 
Let's personalize your content