Sat.Nov 12, 2016 - Fri.Nov 18, 2016

article thumbnail

District Court Refuses to Punish Debt Collector for Accurately Disclosing FDCPA Rights to a Consumer

Consumer Financial Services Law

A New York district court recently dismissed an FDCPA putative class action attempting to penalize a collection agency for disclosing the FDCPA’s cease and desist requirements to a consumer. Illobre v. Fin. Recovery Servs., 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 153525, 16 CV 452 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 3, 2016). The demand letter in question accurately provided the consumer with its Validation Notice under 15 U.S.C. §1692g(a) on the front of the letter.

article thumbnail

CFPB Supervisory Highlights: A Mixed Bag for Debt Collectors

Consumer Financial Services Law

The CFPB’s Fall Supervisory Highlights contains a mixed bag for debt collectors. As you may recall, the Report highlights examinations that were conducted between May and August 2016 and provides a high level summary of the key findings made by the CFPB and the current emphasis of examiners. Debt collection appears to be back as a point of emphasis for examiners.

article thumbnail

CFPB Supervisory Highlights: Auto Loan Servicers Should Re-Examine their Repossession Fee Policies

Consumer Financial Services Law

Auto loan servicers need to pay careful attention to their repossession practices and particularly, their policies concerning repossession fees. The clear message from the CFPB’s Supervisory Highlights is that examiners are focused on repossession activities, “including whether property is being improperly withheld from consumers, what fees are charged, how they are charged, and the context of how consumers are being treated to determine whether the practices are lawful.